The Future of Portable Housing

Those wondering what portable housing actually means, imagine a house that you can move around in without any hassle of building one again to a place where you move. Isn’t that amazing?

Portable housing can be fun | Credits:

We all experience that feeling when we just wish to move away to a place far away from where we reside. Most of the times we suppress that feeling for lack of options and most importantly the feasibility of such a decision. The idea of portable housing is based on these attributes of everyday human lives and challenges the idea of a conventional living space.

Let us discuss what the future holds for portable housing.

Popular, yet not so popular

Today, even though we encounter the instances of portable housing, the idea hasn’t become very popular yet. The reason for the same is that the jobs most of us are engaged in doesn’t allow us this space to roam around in a portable house and yet be accessible. On the other hand, what if you have a big family with you, would you consider living in a portable house? Probably not, so it gets restricted to holidays and special occasions. That said, the day is not far when we could literally imagine living in a portable house and spend our lives travelling and working. How so? Let’s see.

Work from home?

When you think of it, the culture of work from home is gaining importance these days, which in turn is saving a lot of money for the companies by keeping them away from huge office spaces. If the same get to grow bigger, the portable housing can very much become a common choice for our and the coming generation.

Increasing cost of living space

You can spend less than 10 percent on building a portable house for yourself in comparison to buying a new home. So, why not? You get to travel, you get to discover new places and you save big bucks for your family.

Can you live in a portable house forever? | Credit: 

Portable Housing for all?

No! Portable housing is not for all when you think of it. Not everyone out there could manage their life in a portable house with kids, elders or any other family member if you want to have it for a long period of time. What you call an adventure, could be a nightmare for other people. But you can always try first and decide for yourself.

How Favorable is it?

Portable housing in an urban area is a problem, at least for now. The parking space that it requires and the constant torture of overpopulation in cities could be a big hurdle to your peaceful space inside the portable house.

Most of the people take their portable houses to open areas where there is hardly any problem with respect to space. It is more favourable and livable. Maybe down the line, the governments will find a way to make way for parking for portable housing, won’t that be incredible?

What to do now?

Do what you want to do. Even if you choose to come back for the unsuccessful adventure with portable housing, you can always dismantle it and back to living like you were and then again the day you want to take it again for a ride, then do it. Given that it is not a trend today, doesn’e mean that it isn’t worth it.



How Important are Children’s Drawing


It’s a peculiar fact that when Booby Kennedy took up his job at the Department of Justice, the first thing he did was to decorate his office with drawings made by his children.

This was strange because it was unheard of. It was also contradictory to what most office bearers at his position would do, which was to keep pictures or paintings that depicted reality with great detail or something that showcased some kind of important aesthetics.

So what’s so special about children’s drawings?

Today, people have come to become and behave in the most mechanical possible and this is getting harder and harder for those who cannot do so. So, to be successful today, one needs to fit the picture of being mechanized more intensively and those who do the best will be the ones who shall last in this changing time. This has forced us to leave behind or give up some or everything that we have associated with since childhood.

On the other hand, children are still free of the shackles that we have got for ourselves. Their drawings are a memorabilia of our childhood and bits of our personalities in exile. Those affections that we left behind in order to survive in this so called competition of lifestyle.

Another interesting thing about children’s drawings are their inaccuracy, totally different from what art was concerned to be earlier, which was to paint and draw in utmost accuracy. But because the children hardly care about accuracy, they are not concerned about how their drawings will look. This comforts an adult who is stuck in his self conscious mechanized life. It also reminds them of their true needs where we need to give no damn to conformity.

Children are today what we were yesterday, funny, free, careless, naïve and so on. Our lives have forced us to lose our innocence with excessive rationality. This rationality as Max Weber had said, is killing our emotions and making us merely machines of comfortability and prisoner of consciousness.

What’s worse is that sometimes we force our children to do what WE think is RIGHT. Children should be left to choose and do whatever they feel they should. If we really need to do something for them, then pushing them to pursue their dreams is what we must strive for. At the same time we must also restrain them from using excessive digital information, which will one day have a grievous impact on their lives.

Children must remain innocent of the world we have created. Their conscious must be kept away from ours, for we might spoil their childhood, as we know that it’s the only freedom they have from this so called ‘real’ world.


Right To Education – Possible Victim of Minority Institutions?


Last time minority institutions in India made headlines was when Allahabad High Court in 2005 ruled out that AMU was not a minority institution and thus getting into a controversy worldwide. After the issue caught limelight when Centre disowned the claim of AMU and JMI being minority institutions for they are funded by the Centre and do not fulfill the criteria of a minority institutions under the guidelines laid down under NCMEI (National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions) Act, which affiliates these institutions.

Now, the debate is no more restricted to few elite institutions, rather the entire system of Minority Institutions is being put into question. There has been a huge surge in minority institutions throughout the country and especially in the states of Kerala, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, which itself has seen 236 per cent jump in less than a decade. How far is that justifiable is a question we all must ask ourselves and most importantly, when a significant number of these registered minority institutes have been certified after the implementation of Right to Children to Free and Compulsory Education i.e. RTE in 2009. Along with the minority certification comes several perks of running such an institute and one of such perks is the exemption under Article 15(5) from implementing the RTE which reserves 25 per cent seats for economically backward students. Moreover, hiring of teachers and employees in the institution do not need to follow the basic guidelines as bestowed by the constitution under Article 30.

In 2009, before the implementation of RTE, overall 848 minority certifications were issued but in the subsequent years, the numbers rose significantly, 1122 in 2010, 1656 in 2011 and 1966 in 2012. By today around 11384 minority certifications have been provided to institutes throughout the country. Simply put, 11384 educational institutions are free to function as they wish and are being funded as well.

11-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India in the, T.M.A. Pai, 1 Foundation v. State of Karnataka,1 stated:

Article 30 is a special right conferred on the religious and linguistic minorities because of their numerical handicap and to instill in them a sense of security and confidence, even though the minorities cannot be per se regarded as weaker sections or underprivileged segments of the society.

The very simple question that arises here is about the rights of the students who fail to get admissions in these institutions even after securing better scores against the students of the minority. How can that be justified as a sense of security, confidence and equality when one is being treated unfair over the other based on his caste, class, religion or language?

Another Supreme Court ruling in the case of T.M.A. Pai,2, the court observed that:

A minority institution does not cease to be so the moment grant-in-aid is received by the institution. An aided minority educational institution, therefore, would be entitled to have the right of admission of students belonging to the minority group and at the same time, would be required to admit reasonable extent of non-minority students…

So basically, a huge amount of money is being spent on these 11384 institutions in the country by aiding them by the taxpayers money who happen to be the majority, when at the same time the scenario of the Indian education system has failed to provide quality education to the children due to lack of qualified teachers and infrastructure. Again, how does one justify such disparity in education? What happens to the students who are not minority, where would they go when quality education in India is limited to a reserved society or for those who can afford it, be it basic education or higher education. Won’t that discourage the students?  

Here’s what the Article 30(1) and Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution says about minority institutions

In Article 30

(1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice
(1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority, referred to in clause ( 1 ), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause


In Article 29 (1)

  Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same

It is clear from the above articles that the idea of minority institutions is to preserve the culture, literature and art of the minority in the country, but how far is it relevant for these institutions to grow at such a rapid scale and what are the procedures to validate that they are doing their jobs rightly? To put it plainly, it’s hard to point out how many of these institutes are positively using their rights for the betterment of the society. How would anyone know if their certification and exemption from RTE is justifiable over the victimized education system in our country?